pigeon hole theory Archives - https://www.theoryofcomputation.co/tag/pigeon-hole-theory/ Science of Computer Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:16:49 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://i0.wp.com/www.theoryofcomputation.co/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/cropped-favicon-512x512-2.png?fit=32%2C32&ssl=1 pigeon hole theory Archives - https://www.theoryofcomputation.co/tag/pigeon-hole-theory/ 32 32 149926143 Pigeon Hole Principle Mathematical Preliminaries Part 3 https://www.theoryofcomputation.co/pigeon-hole-principle-mathematical-preliminaries-part-3/ Mon, 08 Oct 2018 19:16:49 +0000 https://www.theoryofcomputation.in/?p=266 Pigeon Hole Principle If n+1 or more objects are placed into n boxes, then there is at least one box containing two or more objects. In other words, if A and B  are two sets such that |A| > |B|, then there is no one-to-one function from A to B. Theorem 1: Let n be a positive integer. Every...

The post Pigeon Hole Principle Mathematical Preliminaries Part 3 appeared first on .

]]>
Pigeon Hole Principle

If n+1 or more objects are placed into n boxes, then there is at least one box containing two or more objects. In other words, if and  are two sets such that |A| > |B|, then there is no one-to-one function from A to B.

Theorem 1: Let n be a positive integer. Every sequence of n2 + 1 distinct real numbers contains a subsequence of length n+1 that is either increasing or decreasing.

Proof. For example consider the sequence (20, 10, 9, 7, 11, 2, 21, 1, 20, 31) of 10 = 32 + 1 numbers. This sequence contains an increasing subsequence of length 4 = 3 + 1, namely (10, 11, 21, 31).

The proof of this theorem is by contradiction, and uses the pigeon hole principle.

Let (a1, a2,…..,an2+1) be an arbitrary sequence of n2 + 1 distinct real numbers. For each i with 1 ≤ i ≤ n2 + 1, let inci denote the length of the longest increasing subsequence that starts at ai, and let deci denote the length of the longest decreasing subsequence that starts at ai
Using this notation, the claim in the theorem can be formulated as follows:

There is an index i such that inci ≥ n + 1 or deci ≥ n + 1.

We will prove the claim by contradiction. So we assume that inci ≤ n and deci ≤ n for all i with 1 ≤ i ≤ n2 + 1.
Consider a set

B = {(b,c): 1 ≤ b ≤ n, 1 ≤ c ≤n },

and think of the elements of B as being boxes. For each i with 1 ≤ i ≤ n2 + 1, the pair (inci, deci) is an element of B. So we have n2 + 1 elements (inci, deci), which are placed in the n2 boxes of B. By the pigeon hole principle, there must be a box that contains two (or more) elements. In other words, there exist two integers i and j and

(inci,deci) = (incj,decj)
.
Recall that the elements in the sequence are distinct. Hence, ai ≠ aj. We consider two cases.
First assume that ai < aj . Then the length of the longest increasing subsequence starting at ai must be at least 1 + incj, because we can append ai to the longest increasing subsequence starting at aj. Therefore, inci ≠ incj which is a contradiction.
The second case is when ai > aj. Then the length of the longest decreasing subsequence starting at ai must be at least 1 + decj, because we can append ai to the longest decreasing subsequence starting with aj. Therefore, deci ≠ decj, which is again a contradiction.

The post Pigeon Hole Principle Mathematical Preliminaries Part 3 appeared first on .

]]>
266