The post Proof By Contradiction in Proof Techniques Part 2 appeared first on .
]]>Proof: Assume that the statement S is false. Then, derive a contradiction (such as 1 + 1 = 3).
In other words, show that the statement “¬S ⇒ false” is true. This is sufficient, because the contrapositive of the statement “¬S ⇒ false” is the statement “true ⇒ S”. The latter logical formula is equivalent to S, and that is what we wanted to show.
Proof: We will prove the theorem proof by contradiction. So we assume that n2 is even, but n is odd. Since n is odd, we know in our part 1 Theorem 1 that n2 is odd. This is a contradiction, because we assumed that n2 is even.
Proof: We will prove the theorem by contradiction. So we assume that √2 is rational. Then √2 can be written as a fraction of two integers, √2 = m / n, where m ≥ 1 and n ≥ 1. We may assume that m and n do not share any common factors, i.e., the greatest common divisor of m and n is equal to one; if this is not the case, then we can get rid of the common factors. By squaring √2 = m/n, we get 2n2=m2. This implies that m2 is even.Then by Theorem 2, m is which means that we can write m as m = 2k, for some positive integer k. It follows that 2n2 = m2 = 4k2, which implies that n2 = 2k2. Hence, n2 i
s even. Again by Theorem 2, it follows that n is even.
We have shown that m and n are both even. But we know that m and n are not both even. Hence, we have contradiction. Our assumption that √2 is r
ational is wrong. Thus, we can conclude that √2 is irrational.
There is the nice discussion of this proof in the book My Brain is Open: The Mathematical Journeys of Paul Erdos.
The post Proof By Contradiction in Proof Techniques Part 2 appeared first on .
]]>